twiinklex ❤

Bad decisions make good stories. And I always have a good story.

twiinklex.com
Browsing:

Category: Pop culture reviews

Movie reviews 2012: Part 1

Here it is!! Only for the 40 odd movies released in 2012 because even though I would love to talk about all 250+ films I watched last year, it is quite impossible for a procrastinator like me.  Going in order of date from the earliest onwards. Clicking on each title will link you to the film’s IMDB page where you can read the synopsis 🙂

Personally I think it was one of the worst and most unsatisfactory year for movies. Since complaining is one of the things I do best, expect a lot of criticism. Remember Harper’s Island despite my rating of 7?

Disclaimer: It’s all a matter of preference + opinion so you do not have to agree. I am doing this for fun and out of interest, I do not claim to be a critic or professional. Images are found via Google and edited by me, but I do not own anything.

1. Chronicle (0/10)

chronicle

I hated this film so much that I have one whole entry dedicated to it. One thing I forgot to mention was how the climax scene honestly resembled something out of Powerpuff Girls (the Dynamo episode) where Townsville was in ruins after all the destruction.. At least PPG was enjoyable. This was 111 minutes of torture. There are no redeeming qualities at all, not even a face that is easy on the eyes to make up for all of the film’s shitiness.

To sum it up – worst movie I’ve seen this year, worst movie I’ve ever seen in theatres, and worst movie I’ve ever seen my whole life. I truly have no idea why it’s so well-received by both critics and mass audiences. I try to be open-minded and objective, but I really, truly, deeply, madly hate this movie and wish it never existed.

2. Safe House (6/10)

safe house

This had a review on an individual entry as well because I had time then. I know I gave it an 8 last time but that was 1) before moderation 2) I just watched it so the rush was still there 3) I was still a noob because I hadn’t seen many movies.

Basically it’s not bad and I’m quite okay with it in all aspects. Just that the first half was really draggy and hard to follow at first. A very standard action flick and rather forgettable, okay for a one-time viewing but not something I would keep thinking about or rewatch.

3. This Means War (7/10)

this means war

Not gonna lie, I enjoyed every bit of it because it was really funny and entertaining. But at the same time, it was predictable and highly superficial. What little “action” there is exists only as a plot device. I really hate plot devices that serve no real purpose other than to move the storyline along, especially when they are so lazy that they don’t even bother trying to convince you otherwise or justify its existence.

I wouldn’t have minded more focus on the action part on the movie if the subplot had been stronger. After all, the guys are agents. Surely there is more to life than abusing resources on romance and pitting against each other over a girl.

Oh and how convenient she was kidnapped… something that happened because the two guys were too busy being immature and fighting. I don’t even feel like the kidnapper was dangerous and the agents seemed to get rid of him so easily. Quite a let down seeing how the opening scene of them taking out the bad guys was pretty good.

Another problem I have is how the characters are flat and lack emotional depth. I don’t even want to get started on how the female lead (who isn’t even that interesting or special) fell in love with Chris Pine’s character anyway, despite how he showed her the fake side of himself in his attempts to woo her. The film didn’t convince me that she fell for who he really is and not who he pretended to be since the whole film was all about his pretenses??

And yes, it was obvious who would end up with who after all the characters made their first appearance. Because again, how convenient that Tom Hardy’s character already had a son and ex-wife who we saw quite a bit of… happily ever after for everyone, right?

Maybe I’m being harsh but 7 is still high for a rom-com flick.
Anyway, 100 people on Yahoo Answers agreed with my opinion 😀

4. The Hunger Games (7/10)

the hunger games

Ah, mixed feelings…

This needs an entry on its own too because I have so much to say about the whole series. Let’s just say that there is no film I overhyped myself more than I did for The Hunger Games because at one point I was really obsessed with the series (Remember? Ha.) plus both critics and mass audiences raved about the movie.

However, the film did not capture the essence of the book at all. Especially not the complexity of the characters’ relationships. This is what happens when companies want to make money and set it at a lower rating that will appeal to more audiences. I can’t even be bothered to download its torrent and I still don’t feel like watching it again.

Not helped by the fact that the quality of the books declined as the story progressed. Not helped by the fact that I soon discovered the awesomeness of Battle Royale whose novel and manga adaptation were FLAWLESS. Not helped by the fact that while I still love Hunger Games, I don’t really have respect for it since the author doesn’t respect us readers enough to write a satisfactory ending, nor does she respect the characters she had created herself to give them the closure they deserved. Not helped by the fact that I quite resent the series at the same time because it is a blatant rip off Battle Royale.

Oddly enough, its trailer was one of the best I’d ever seen and was what attracted my interest in the series in the first place. I will write a detailed review comparing the books, film and Battle Royale sometime. It’s just a matter of when lol. I love this Honest Trailer though… basically everything.

5. The Avengers (9.5/10)

the avengers

Was so brilliant and gave me so many feels that it has a review on an individual entry (all of which was praise okay) as well. I know it was supposed to have a perfect 10/10 rating except that I rewatched it again months later and it actually bored me -_- To be fair, it dropped down the IMDB charts too.

I think they spent too much time trying to tell us that the heroes all had their differences and couldn’t get along. All the arguing got kinda old on a repeat viewing. We get it, okay? Would be better if they spent more time showing how everyone overcame their inner demons but nevermind. There was this part where Thor couldn’t pick up his hammer but they didn’t explain why or how he managed to pick it up eventually. Plus nobody is really scared of Loki because we all love Tom Hiddles too much, so I don’t feel like the movie really has a villain.

Honest Trailers nailed it though:
“A movie so fulfilling, you won’t remember that the first ??? minutes are actually kind of boring.”

Still, the flaws are so minimal that I can overlook them because the overall awesomeness of the film made up for  everything. Even the shots are well-done. Same goes for the beautiful ending credits. I love that the movie doesn’t take itself and its characters too seriously with all its light-hearted humour.

If I had to pick, this would be my favourite movie of 2012. Watched it twice in theatres (because I fell asleep the first time) and once more at a sleepover (that’s when I got bored, though I was restless and bored with everything that day). Definitely something I’d rewatch. I have the bluray torrent but I’m going to buy the DVD once prices drop anyway.

6. The Vow (6.5/10)

the vow

While it was no The Notebook, I thought it was pretty okay (though slow and boring at times) and most importantly, realistic. The ending was definitely not what I’d expected and I think Rachel McAdams’ character was developed very well. Instead of letting her life be dictated by a guy, even if it’s her husband, she went on this path of self-discovery after her memory loss and it was like living her life all over again.

Despite not being able to remember anything, rather than accepting life the way it was, she went to experience everything again, made choices again. I don’t really know how to explain but it was really great seeing her discover why she made those choices in the first place and finding herself by experiencing everything all over again.

Even where her husband was concerned, she never really remembered him but they started getting to know each other all over again. The significance of how they met on the streets again and decided to try a new cafe instead of their usual was really symbolic, since it meant that they no longer are trying to force things back to how they were like before. Rather, they are starting afresh on a clean slate.

I’d expected a fluffy ending so it really took me by surprise. Which really wrapped up the point and message of the whole movie perfectly. It also complemented the theme and narration of “finding their way back to each other”.

7. Snow White and The Huntsman (6/10)

snow white and the huntsman

First of all, I just want to say that I don’t dislike Kristen Stewart and she’s actually quite good in her other non-Twilight movies. In fact, sometimes I think she is pretty and I quite like her, other times I’m neutral. She was quite bad in this film though, so no wonder the Razzie nomination for Worst Actress.

This movie really bored me and whatever “modern twist” they are trying to bring to the fairytale, it didn’t work nor did it interest me. The plot itself was typical and nothing outstanding. Storyline was slow and draggy and even boring. I quite like the cast but the characters were really unbelievable and uninteresting.

The dwarves were weird, I’m not sure what the point of Sam Claflin’s character aka the young prince was, there was no chemistry between Snow White and the Huntsman so the kisses were all weird… thank god they didn’t really expand on a romantic subplot.

Really love the visual effects though, which you can tell are stunning from the above still. I think it deserves it Oscar nomination for Best Achievement in Visual Effects and in a year of crap movies, this category is the only one that interests me in this year’s Oscars because all the nominees are strong and deserving.

Anyway, my biggest issue with this film is ironically who they casted as Snow White because Kristen Stewart did not even meet basic requirements where appearance is concerned. I am not saying she is ugly. However, the film opened with a monologue describing Snow White’s beauty in detail. If you are going to have such a monologue in which you place such great emphasis on Snow White’s flawless beauty, then shouldn’t you cast someone that matches what you describe?

Really dark hair, fair skin, red lips and perfect beauty — none of which Kristen Stewart has plus I keep noticing her crooked teeth. She just looks very ordinary and honestly, Charlize Theron looks really stunning and outshines her. So it’s weird that one plays the supposedly flawless Snow White while the other plays the jealous old stepmother.

I probably would watch the sequel out of curiosity but definitely not in theatres.


Harper’s Island

Can’t be bothered to hide spoilers so don’t read if you are planning to watch. Won’t explicitly mention names or reveal the killer’s identity but still. You have been warned.

harper's island

13 weeks. 25 suspects. 1 killer.

Finished watching Harper’s Island in less than 24 hours awhile back and thought I’d blog about it. Frankly speaking, I was kinda disappointed because I had very high expectations (as usual, but why should I lower them or settle for second best. If everyone raves about it, then it should live up to its hype). I expected something mindblowing like Identity (2003), unforgettable like A Perfect Getaway (2009), and addictive like Vampire Diaries. Unfortunately it was anything but.

Watched it so quickly not cos I was hooked but rather, I wanted to finish everything so that I could remove it from my laptop. Dislike the feeling of clutter on my laptop so I tend to delete everything once I don’t need them anymore. I even stupidly deleted all my schoolwork because I forgot about building a portfolio but nvm.

Pros:

– Everyone and no one feels like a suspect
– The next victim could be anyone
– Good buildup of fear in the middle
– Episodes are named after the sounds of how people die in that particular ep
– Some death scenes were actually sad (many were scientifically impossible/illogical)
– I got distracted and thrown off the tracks for a bit
– 3 dreamboats that are very pleasant to the eye

Gosh I love seeing them, especially the first two ❤_❤

Speaking of which, the show failed to make me particularly attached to any of the characters. I only liked 4 of them. Didn’t like Abby (main female character) very much, even wished she would just leave the island. Only rooted for one couple. Weak character-building that used stereotypes rather than slowly developing the characters. Only the more significant few were given a backstory.

Not enough focus on the island’s history as well. I expected a lot more flashbacks but there were hardly any. It’s always the same one about how 7 years ago, the murders took place. We see all these people whose faces are hardly shown being strung up on the tree, and then it zooms in onto Abby’s dead mother.

If you are going to write a show about the island’s history repeating itself, then shouldn’t you give the audience more insight into the particular history? If you claim that the modus operandi of the murderer is exactly the same 7 years ago and now, then I expect details on the similarities. In present day, people died in so many different ways and yet all I know about 7 years ago is that a bunch of people were strung up on a tree. How is this a copycat murder?

I thought maybe in the final episode when they were about to reveal the killer, Abby or someone would find all her friends strung up on a tree, their fates and bodies finally revealed. At least then there would be a link to 7 years ago, not just the similarity of people dying one by one.

I mean, not all the bodies were discovered even at the end. The characters hardly knew when someone died, they just bought the “returned back to town” or “MIA” excuse. Only when it’s clear that they were the small group left surviving did they assume that everyone else is dead.

Harper's Island

Another thing I expected to see was a flashback of how the murderer committed all the killings when his identity was revealed. You know, like in the movies. No such luck. And since there were 2 muderers and so many pranks + accidents, I had to figure out for myself who was the one responsible for this death, which other characters pulled the pranks, and who actually died by accident.

This flashback was like the “make it or break it” moment for me. The moment where I get blown away as we go back to see all the signs and how each murder was carried out. But it didn’t even exist. We didn’t even get to witness the some of the murders. A dead body could suddenly appear in the tunnel. Wow, how did she disapper and when? I guess we will never know. So don’t expect me to buy the story of how the murderer was clever enough to get rid of everybody one by one without being caught if I didn’t get to see it myself.

Most importantly, don’t expect me to buy the murder motive. This was what disappointed me the most. After a reasonably good buildup of 12 episodes, you tell me in the 13th that he did it all for love. That he killed everyone so that she would not have anyone left but him and hence his love will be requited. Is this a joke? I’m not convinced at all. Talk about a weak motive. Understatement of the century in all of murder-verse.

Not even sure if he had a personality disorder of sorts because the trouble he went through just to get the girl is simply unbelievable. If he had any, it definitely only surfaced in the finale episode, trust me.

I thought it was terrible enough that it turned out the first murderer from 7 years ago wasn’t dead at all. No surprise there either. The story kinda went downhill from there when he made his appearance. Ugh his character was just plain redundant. It took away whatever awesomeness the second murderer’s character had since now we know 2 people were behind everything.

Brings me back to point of how the storyline is not very smart at all. Since we didn’t witness every murder, it could be either killer who was responsible for a certain death. Oh, the second killer has an alias? Well, then just take it that the first murderer was behind it. He seems inconspicious? Oh that’s because it wasn’t him, hahahaha. Just NO.

There shouldn’t have been more than one murderer but I guess they can’t achieve that without making the motive and storyline dumber. This is why I say they should have worked more on everybody’s backstory. I wouldn’t mind watching more episodes if it guaranteed a satisfying show.

Of course, there is the character which they used as the “red herring” to throw everyone off the tracks. Okay, I fell for it myself. But I thought it was kinda silly how they didn’t even bother being subtle about it, just shoved it all in your face in one episode. At least put in some effort with foreshadowing if you wanna lead people into believing that this is the murderer.

Not all loose ends were neatly tied up either, leading to a sloppy storyline with plotholes. If you are going to throw a red herring in our faces, then explain the reasons why it’s not actually him. For example, he escapes death on more than one occasion. The first time was apparently because someone traded his life for his. What about the rest?

Ok, maybe the killer is simply a man of his word and promises not to touch the red herring at all. Other than making him the scapegoat. Which is enough reason to keep him alive until the killer’s real identity is revealed. However, it seems really doubtful that he is obviously in the murderer’s way of getting the girl, being her direct love interest for all 13 episodes, but he gets to survive. So you painstakingly plan the murder of 20+ people for this girl, yet leave the biggest threat to your goal alone?

Nothing mentioned about the locals who survived, or the creepy girl staring at Abby from inside the store when she went to collect her scrapbook. Nor the precious little dog who is seen scurrying about here and there. More plotholes, if you are interested [x]

Most annoying and hated character goes to…

Madison Allen

Stupid little bitch has to be held responsible for some of the deaths but yet none of the characters even blamed her and her idiotic mom kept shielding her. Not only does she get really spooky at times, breaks precious china and then claims it wasn’t here like there’s some supernatural element creeping around (there isn’t), but she lies and hides the truth for goodness knows what reason. Hence rescue was delayed for some characters, indirectly causing their death. If it weren’t for her, the rest probably could have figured out the truth quickly. But she still keeps lying!!!!

Stupid little shithead, I hate her. Funny thing is the useless and annoying people survived, while my favourite characters got the worst of the lot and died really heartbreaking deaths. I think she’s the most universally hated character on the show despite her young age. I don’t sympathise with her at all.

Favourite thing about the show…

Harper's Island

Chemistry, checked. Character development, checked. Humour, checked. Heartbreak, checked.

Love all their scenes together, it’s like they are the only thing that made sense on the whole show. At first, we all thought Chloe (the only likeable female character, tbh) was this flirty bimbo who didn’t care much for Cal but it turned out we were wrong and it’s apparent she cared very much about him. As the show went no, their relationship grew stronger.

A strong, non-wishy-washy, outgoing female who knew very well what she wanted (if it were me, I probably wouldn’t be able to choose between Cal and Sully hahaha), and her “cute little Englishman (oh, that accent). Love how they pranked Sully with feathers, love how they sntached their ring back in the bar, love how he told her to keep the ring for him because he had something to ask her when he returned, love how he was so determined to save her, etc. Every scene with them is either funny or emotional.

Their presence brightened up the whole show; the heart and soul of Harper’s Island. For me, anyway.

Saddest death goes to…

Matt Barr

Your face, baby. Your face. That moment when disbelief, betrayal, hurt and realisation flashes across your face all at once. You got stabbed in the back, literally and figuratively. One of the best characters in the show who slowly stole the show. If Chloe and Cal’s deaths were painful, yours ripped my heart out, trampled all over it and then shoved it back down my throat. Thank you for being so kickass and righteous and loyal.

Cons in a nutshell:

– Weak characterisation
– Unconvincing murder motive
– Lack of subtle foreshadowing
– Insufficient focus on island’s history
– Sloppy, unpolished murder storyline
– Abrupt ending lacking closure
– Hardly any cliffhangers (my idea of cliffies has been unrealistically high after TVD)

As a murder thriller, the cons definitely outweighed the pros. Just as well that it’s only 13 episodes. I would hate being strung along even futher for such a crappy ending. Honestly, if would be so much better if the murder motive was different. It could have gone so many ways!

Can’t believe this turned out so long, critical and harsh. The more I wrote, the more flaws I noticed. I haven’t even read reviews on other sites to see what other people thought. But seeing that I rated the show a 7/10 on IMDb after finishing it, it’s definitely not all that bad for a mini TV series. It was entertaining and I didn’t not enjoy it 🙂

Amazed at the time I spent writing this and editing all the pictures looool
Can I just marry Sully already. Or Jimmy. Shhh don’t tell Damon.

harper's island characters